California Supreme Court Decides Landmark Wage And Hour Class Action Case
Time 1 Minute Read

Brinker International, one of the world's leading casual dining restaurant companies, announced yesterday that the California Supreme Court has issued an opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. et al. v. The Superior Court for the State of California for the County of San Diego (Hohnbaum). This long-awaited decision, on which Hunton & Williams attorneys M. Brett Burns, Laura M. Franze, and Susan J. Sandidge served as counsel of record for Brinker, resolves multiple first-impression issues regarding California meal period and rest break class actions. Among other things, the Court answered fundamentally important questions regarding the nature of an employer’s duty with respect to employee meal periods, concluding that the duty is to provide a meal period, with the employee thereafter at liberty to use the meal period for whatever purpose he or she desires, and rejecting the suggestion that the employer must ensure that no work is done. This landmark decision will benefit California employers and employees, and provide important guidance for employers defending meal period and rest break wage and hour class actions in California. If you have any questions about the Brinker case, please call our California partners.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

Google recently resolved two cases—one by verdict and one by settlement—involving allegations regarding the control that Google promised to give users over Google’s use of their data. 

Time 3 Minute Read

On September 2, 2025, two class actions were filed in federal district court alleging that defendants digital advertising platforms Xandr, Inc. and Index Exchange, Inc. violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act by unlawfully intercepting wire communications for the purpose of violating the Department of Justice’s Bulk Data Transfer Rule.

Time 5 Minute Read

On February 27, 2027, in Chabolla v. ClassPass Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in a split 2-1 decision, held that website users were not bound by the terms of a “sign-in wrap” agreement.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 20, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia granted a motion for class certification in a class action alleging that WebMD violated the federal Video Privacy Protection Act by disclosing certain user data to Facebook without the users’ consent. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page