The DOJ’s About-Face on Gender Identity Discrimination under Title VII
Time 2 Minute Read

On October 5, 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions released a formal letter on behalf of the United States Department of Justice stating the DOJ’s official position that Title VII “does not prohibit discrimination based on gender identity per se, including transgender status,” officially retracting the DOJ’s previous position under the Obama Administration and setting up a direct conflict with the EEOC’s current position on the scope of Title VII.

Sessions’s letter comes amid growing confusion as to whether “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” are protected under Title VII.  As we previously reported, several circuit courts are reevaluating their stance on the viability of sexual orientation claims under Title VII.  In April, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting en banc, became the first federal appellate court to officially recognize a discrimination claim under Title VII based solely on the plaintiff’s sexual orientation.  Following on its heels, the Second Circuit also granted a request for the full court to decide the issue, with arguments scheduled for later this fall.

Sessions’s October 5 letter was not the Trump Administration’s first official statement on these issues.  In July, the DOJ filed an amicus brief in the Second Circuit case, arguing that sexual orientation was not a protected category under Title VII.

This continues to be a developing area of the law and is likely to be ultimately resolved by the United States Supreme Court.  Employers should continue to monitor developments in this area and be prepared to revise their policies and practices accordingly.

  • Partner

    Ryan has a national practice focused on representing employers and executives in complex labor and employment litigation.  Ryan’s litigation experience is both broad and deep, and he is particularly skilled in defending ...

  • Counsel

    Tyler represents and advises employers on a wide range of labor and employment matters, including complex wage and hour issues, union organizing and other traditional labor matters, discrimination claims and other employment ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 5 Minute Read

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently filed four lawsuits against states related to specific climate change actions they have taken or planned to take. On April 30, 2025, DOJ preemptively sued Hawaii and Michigan to prevent both states from going forward with their stated intent to pursue legal action against fossil fuel companies for alleged harms caused by climate change and to declare those states’ claims unconstitutional. The following day, on May 1, 2025, DOJ sued New York and Vermont for their enactment of climate “superfund” laws, which create retroactive cost recovery claims on producers of fossil fuels, seeking to enjoin the enforcement of those statutes and to have them declared unconstitutional as well.

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 8, 2025, Acting CFTC Chairman Caroline D. Pham issued Release Number 9063-25 regarding the digital asset industry. The release favorably cites a recent DOJ memorandum on the digital asset industry, and it instructs the CFTC staff to comply with President Trump’s executive orders regarding digital assets enforcement priorities and charging considerations.

Time 3 Minute Read

On April 7, 2025, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a memorandum to all DOJ employees entitled “Ending Regulation By Prosecution.” The memorandum describes DOJ’s new priorities regarding prosecution of crimes involving digital assets and the broader cryptocurrency industry.

Time 4 Minute Read

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin vetoed an artificial intelligence (“AI”) bill on March 24 that would have regulated how employers used automation in the hiring process. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page