Governor Abbott Issues Executive Order Prohibiting Vaccine Mandates in Texas
Time 2 Minute Read
Governor Abbott Issues Executive Order Prohibiting Vaccine Mandates in Texas
Categories: Employment Law

On October 11, 2021, Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, issued Executive Order GA-40, which proscribes entities from compelling individuals to receive the COVID-19 vaccine who object “for any reason of personal conscience, based on a religious belief, or for medical reasons, including prior recovery from COVID-19.” Offending entities can be fined up to $1,000 for failing to comply with this order.

This order follows three previous executive orders from Governor Abbott prohibiting certain entities and others from requiring Texans to get the COVID-19 vaccine or possess a vaccine passport, but it is the only one that prohibits private employers in Texas from requiring their employees to be vaccinated.

Governor Abbott issued this executive order shortly before OSHA’s forthcoming emergency temporary standard is expected to be instituted. This upcoming regulation will require employers with more than 100 employees to mandate that their workforce either be fully vaccinated or provide weekly negative COVID-19 test results. While it is unclear how the two will interact with each other, Executive Order GA-40 may be reconcilable with OSHA’s forthcoming regulation because the latter will allow for unvaccinated employees, so long as they are tested weekly.

However, GA-40 appears to be in direct conflict with President Biden’s executive order requiring that federal government contractors receive the COVID-19 vaccine, as well as the forthcoming Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services emergency regulation, which will require health care workers for those entities that receive Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements to be vaccinated.

While Governor Abbott’s executive order is a significant legal development in Texas, it remains unclear how future legal challenges and guidance will instruct this legal issue. Employers should work with counsel to ensure compliance with the various and conflicting legal requirements until the law is further developed.

  • Partner

    Holly represents management in employment law litigation, trials, and advice, unfair competition litigation and advice, contract negotiations and litigation, drug testing planning, advice, policies, and litigation, and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

North Carolina has once again favored policyholders seeking insurance coverage for COVID-19 business interruption losses. A recent decision from the Middle District of North Carolina in Durham Wood Fired Pizza Co. LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., reinforces the North State Deli decision and suggests that a failure to provide coverage for COVID-19 business interruption claims may constitute bad faith.

Time 2 Minute Read

On November 4, 2025, the Supreme Court of Nevada denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by insurers seeking to challenge denial of their partial summary judgment motion on the issue of whether Covid-19 may cause “direct physical loss, damage or destruction” of property under an all-risk insurance policy that includes affirmative coverage for loss caused by infectious disease.

Time 2 Minute Read

On September 18, 2025, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the agency will be prioritizing the review of new chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) that are intended for use in data center projects, including the infrastructure that powers data centers, or for the manufacturing of covered components, as defined by Executive Order (EO) 14318, “Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure.” This prioritization of reviews will start with submissions received on or after September 29, 2025, and could accelerate time to market for chemistries supporting the expansion of US data center capacity. 

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 15, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order, Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement, aimed at streamlining federal procurement. The Executive Order called for reforming the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), the regulations that form the structure of most of the $1.5 trillion the federal government spends on contracts annually.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page