Governor Newsom Announces Tentative Legislative Deal To Reform PAGA
Time 2 Minute Read

Business and labor groups in California have reached a tentative legislative deal to preserve—but reform—the State’s much criticized law known formally as the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, Cal. Lab. Code § 2698, et seq. (“PAGA”).  Governor Gavin Newsom announced the deal on Tuesday.

PAGA’s supporters say the law is needed as a backstop to understaffed and underfunded state regulators, notwithstanding reports that California has hundreds of millions of dollars sitting in a fund earmarked for that purpose.  PAGA’s critics have argued the law provides the plaintiff’s bar with a vehicle to extract large attorneys’ fees awards from dubious and expensive lawsuits, that provide little benefit to workers.  They also argue the law has been unfairly weaponized against large, law-abiding companies with coffers to pay inflated settlements, rather than bad actors who knowingly disadvantage employees, and much has been written about the negative impact of PAGA on small businesses in California.

Based on those criticisms, among others, business groups backed an initiative eligible for the November ballot that they say would repeal and replace PAGA.  According to Governor Newsom, the proponents of the PAGA ballot initiative have agreed to withdraw their measure if the recently reached deal is timely signed into law.

While the bill’s text does not yet appear to be available, Governor Newsom’s announcement touts the following features of the deal, among others:

  • Standing: Requires the employee to have experienced the alleged violations personally.
  • Reducing Litigation: Expands the Labor Code sections that can be cured to reduce the need for litigation and make employees “whole” more quickly.
  • Streamlining Litigation: Codifies a court’s ability to limit the scope of claims presented at trial to facilitate manageability.
  • Reforming PAGA’s penalty structure:
    • Encourages compliance with labor laws by capping penalties on employers who quickly take steps to fix policies and practices, and make workers whole;
    • Creates new, higher penalties on employers who act maliciously, fraudulently or oppressively in violating labor laws; and
    • Ensures that more of the penalties go to employees by increasing their allocation from 25% to 35%.

Advocates for employers and employees alike are sure to scrutinize the proposed statutory text.  We will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates as developments warrant.

  • Counsel

    Kirk has defended clients in dozens of class actions involving employee and consumer claims as well as statewide representative actions brought pursuant to the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 ...

  • Partner

    Emily co-chairs the firm’s labor and employment group and has a national practice focusing on complex employment and wage and hour litigation and advice. Emily is an accomplished trial lawyer who defends employers in complex ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the CalPrivacy announced its first enforcement action involving student privacy, requiring PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine for alleged violations of the CCPA’s opt-out rights and requirements.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page