New Year, New Employer Obligations: California's Enhanced Whistleblower Protection Notice Requirement Takes Effect January 1, 2025
Time 2 Minute Read
New Year, New Employer Obligations: California's Enhanced Whistleblower Protection Notice Requirement Takes Effect January 1, 2025

As we ring in the new year, California employers face an important new compliance requirement: an updated Whistleblower Rights Notice must be prominently posted in the workplace beginning January 1, 2025.

Currently, employers are already required to display workplace notices that inform employees of their rights and protections under whistleblower laws. However, with the passage of AB 2299 earlier this year, this requirement has been streamlined. Under AB 2299, the Labor Commissioner was directed to develop an official model notice to help employers meet their whistleblower protection posting requirements. The Labor Commissioner has now released the new model notice, titled “Whistleblowers Are Protected.” Employers can access it directly here: Whistleblower Notice - California Labor Commissioner.

This official notice serves as a compliant, ready-to-use template for workplace display, making it easier for employers to fulfill their obligations and also ensures employees receive clear and consistent information about their rights. Beginning January 1, 2025, employers who use and post the model notice provided by the Labor Commissioner will automatically be deemed compliant with whistleblower posting requirements under California law.

Employers may create their own whistleblower notice as long as it meets specific requirements. The notice must be displayed in at least 14-point font and prominently placed in a location easily accessible to employees, such as a break room or common area. Additionally, it must include all required whistleblower rights and responsibilities, along with the whistleblower hotline number: 1-800-952-5225.

Key Takeaways for Employers

The updated whistleblower notice provides clear information about employees' rights to report workplace violations without fear of retaliation, as well as guidance on how to file complaints with the appropriate state agencies. These changes are part of California’s broader efforts to create safer, more transparent workplaces and to hold employers accountable for compliance with labor and employment laws.

As January 1, 2025, approaches, employers are encouraged to review their notice-posting policies and update their practices to meet this new requirement.

  • Associate

    Andrea focuses her practice on labor and employment law. She litigates a wide variety of wage and hour class actions, California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) actions, and multi- and single-plaintiff cases involving claims ...

  • Partner

    Holly represents management in employment law litigation, trials, and advice, unfair competition litigation and advice, contract negotiations and litigation, drug testing planning, advice, policies, and litigation, and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page