New York Overhauls Discrimination and Harassment Laws in Second #MeToo Wave
Time 2 Minute Read
New York Overhauls Discrimination and Harassment Laws in Second #MeToo Wave

Yesterday, Governor Cuomo signed the last of several bills that massively overhauls New York State’s discrimination and harassment laws.  The changes, some of which are effective immediately, are explained in more detail here.

The main takeaways are as follows:

  1. It will be easier for Plaintiffs to prove harassment.  Specifically, Plaintiffs are no longer required to establish that the harassing conduct was “severe or pervasive.”  On the flip side, employers can no longer rely on the Faragher/Ellerth defense.
  2. It will be easier for Plaintiffs to prove discrimination.  Specifically, Plaintiffs are no longer required to show the existence of comparators—i.e., similarly-situated individuals outside of their protected class who were treated more favorable.
  3. Attorney fees awards are now mandatory for prevailing Plaintiffs.
  4. Punitive damages are available for all discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims.
  5. Non-disclosure/confidentiality clauses in settlement agreement are now banned for all discrimination and harassment claims unless it is “the complainant’s preference.”
  6. Pay equity protections are now expanded to all protected classes—not just gender.
  7. Employers are severely limited in requesting and relying upon an applicant’s prior salary history before making an employment offer.

Employers are advised to take a fresh look at their policies and practices to ensure that they are in line with all the recent changes in New York employment laws.

  • Partner

    Ryan has distinguished himself as a nationwide litigator handling complex employment litigation, trade secret cases, and other high-stakes litigation.  Ryan has litigated cases in the state and federal courts of 25 states.  He has ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin vetoed an artificial intelligence (“AI”) bill on March 24 that would have regulated how employers used automation in the hiring process. 

Time 3 Minute Read

On December 6, 2023, the US Supreme Court heard arguments for Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, which may have significant implications for discrimination cases under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Specifically, the Supreme Court in this case could clarify whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires a clear showing of significant disadvantage or tangible harm to have an actionable claim.

Time 3 Minute Read

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) published proposed enforcement guidance for workplace harassment for public comment on October 2, 2023. The proposed guidance can be found on the EEOC’s website. While the EEOC attempted to provide updated harassment guidance under the Trump administration in 2017, final guidance was never issued and if this new guidance is finalized it would represent the first time the EEOC has updated its workplace harassment guidance in nearly a quarter century.

Time 3 Minute Read

Last week, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in Sharp v. S&S Activewear, L.L.C. where it confirmed that music in the workplace can form the basis of a Title VII sex harassment claim even when it is (1) not directed at any particular individual employee, and (2) offends both female and male employees.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page