New York Releases HERO Act Standard, Sample Plan: What Employers Need to Know
Time 2 Minute Read
New York Releases HERO Act Standard, Sample Plan: What Employers Need to Know

The New York State Department of Labor released its anticipated airborne infectious disease standard and sample plan on July 6.  Employers have until August 5, 2021 to adopt or create a plan to comply with the standard.

In May, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the HERO Act, which “sets a standard not just for COVID-19, but for all airborne infectious diseases.” The forward-looking law applies to all infectious diseases designated by the state health commissioner as highly contagious and presenting a serious risk of harm to public health.  The Act applies to all employers with worksites located in New York, unless they are already covered by OSHA’s federal emergency temporary standard for COVID-19.

Pursuant to the Act, the state department of health published an airborne infectious disease standard and model exposure prevention plan.  Both the standard and the plan are straightforward, and contain many of the same requirements that were common during COVID-19 – provisions related to physical distancing, hand washing, face masks, symptom screening and flexible working arrangements.  They also contain robust anti-retaliation provisions that protect employees who voice concerns about infectious disease protocols or refuse to work if they reasonably believe, in good faith, that continued work exposes them to an unreasonable risk of exposure to a qualifying airborne infectious disease.

Employers have the option to adopt the state’s model plan or draft their own plan that applies with the requirements of the standard.  Because of the relative simplicity of the sample plan and its user-friendly nature, most employers will adopt some version of it.  If employers elect to create their own alternative plan, the standard requires them to consult and include their employees in the process.

Notably, employers are not required to implement their HERO Act plans immediately.  COVID-19 is not currently designated by the New York state health commissioner as a highly contagious infectious disease presenting a serious risk of harm to the public health.  So for now, employers are required to create their plans, but do not need to operate under them.

The regulations require employers to conduct a “verbal review” of their plan with employees, and suggest that review should happen once the plan is completed, regardless of infectious disease conditions.  Employers must also post a copy of their plans at their worksites, and distribute copies to employees.

 

  • Associate

    Reilly counsels employers on labor-management relations, OSHA compliance and complex employment law issues. Reilly has worked on multiple union organizing campaigns and counseled employers through the representation ...

  • Partner

    Susan focuses her practice on labor, employment, and OSHA compliance, defense, and crisis response. She provides comprehensive OSHA representation of employers across all industry sectors. She has counseled and defended ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), does not have a safety standard specifically addressing extreme weather. Instead, OSHA relies on the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act to address identified hazards to workers in extreme weather. The General Duty Clause requires employers to provide employees “a place of employment which [is] free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm.”

Time 4 Minute Read

North Carolina has once again favored policyholders seeking insurance coverage for COVID-19 business interruption losses. A recent decision from the Middle District of North Carolina in Durham Wood Fired Pizza Co. LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., reinforces the North State Deli decision and suggests that a failure to provide coverage for COVID-19 business interruption claims may constitute bad faith.

Time 2 Minute Read

On November 4, 2025, the Supreme Court of Nevada denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by insurers seeking to challenge denial of their partial summary judgment motion on the issue of whether Covid-19 may cause “direct physical loss, damage or destruction” of property under an all-risk insurance policy that includes affirmative coverage for loss caused by infectious disease.

Time 1 Minute Read

Hunton’s OSHA lawyers will provide an update on the status of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) under the Trump administration. The discussion will include the status of current rulemaking, DOGE’s impact on OSHA operations, enforcement trends, and state plan developments.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page