Ninth Circuit Rules California’s ABC Test is Not Preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act
Time 2 Minute Read
Ninth Circuit Rules California’s ABC Test is Not Preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act

In an April 28, 2021 decision, the Ninth Circuit determined that the application of California’s ABC test (also known as AB-5) to motor carriers is not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (“F4A”). The ABC test is a judicially-created independent contractor test that was ultimately codified via AB-5. For a more in-depth discussion of AB 5, visit our previous blog post here.

The case, California Trucking Association, et al. v. Rob Bonita, et al., was brought by the trade organization that represents motor carriers who hire independent owner-operators to transport property. CTA sought to enjoin enforcement of AB-5, and in particular, the “B” prong of the ABC test, which states that a worker is an employee unless they perform work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business. In particular, CTA argued that AB-5’s “B” prong contravened F4A’s express preemption of any state law regarding the price, route, or service of any motor carrier. The district court determined that CTA was likely to succeed on the merits of its claim and granted a preliminary injunction.

The Ninth Circuit reversed in a 2-1 opinion, and held that the F4A did not preempt AB-5 because it is a labor law of general applicability that “does not bind, compel, or otherwise freeze into place the prices, routes, or services of motor carriers.” Rather, it affects a motor carrier’s relationship with its workforce. According to the Ninth Circuit, a state law does not have a binding or freezing effect simply because a motor carrier has to consider the law in making business decisions. As such, the law was not “significantly related to rates, routes, or services.”

The Ninth Circuit’s ruling threatens a decades-old practice of motor carriers hiring a workforce of independent-owner operators and classifying them as independent contractors. CTA has stated that it is seeking an en banc rehearing. In the meantime, motor carriers should work with their labor and employment counsel to ensure that they comply with California’s strict requirements regarding independent contractors.

  • Associate

    Katherine provides thoughtful but aggressive representation to businesses and their executives to solve their most complicated legal problems. She has extensive experience managing high-stakes commercial and trade secrets ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

On February 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Wage and Hour Division proposed a new rule to determine whether workers are independent contractors or employees under federal wage-and-hour laws.

Time 7 Minute Read

For companies assessing their compliance obligations under California’s climate disclosure laws, the whirlwind of legal developments, shifting implementation guidance from the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and uncertainty about the laws’ applicability and substantive compliance obligations continues to present challenges.

Time 4 Minute Read

The Ninth Circuit recently upheld key provisions of California’s Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act, including a ban on personalized social media feeds for minors and a requirement to implement default privacy settings on minors’ social media accounts.

Time 3 Minute Read

A lawsuit recently filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California is testing the constitutional limits of California’s worker classification law. In the suit entitled Blu Nail Bar, Inc et al v. Newsom et al, a group of Vietnamese American-owned nail salons in Southern California are suing the state, alleging that the application of Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page