NLRB’s Latest Statistics - Union Elections Faster After Ambush Election Rules
Time 2 Minute Read

We previously have discussed that, as expected, the implementation of the NLRB’s ambush election rules in April 2015 considerably shortened the average time between the date of a petition being filed by a union and the date of election.  This change substantially impacts the employer’s ability to conduct an effective campaign in the event of a union petition.

The data from the first nine months since the NLRB’s implementation of the controversial rules clearly demonstrates the impact of the new rules.  The NLRB released quarterly representation case statistics on February 25, 2016 comparing the results for the nine months since the new election regulations went into effect (April 14, 2015 – January 14, 2016) with the comparable time period in 2014-2015 when the old election regulations were still in use.

  • The numbers (which if consistent with past NLRB policy are medians) continue to reflect the trends we have noted previously, as well as a couple of interesting results: The time between the election petition and
    • the pre-election hearing decreased from 13 days to 10 days – just three days over the 7 day target under the new rules.
    • an election agreement dropped by 28%, from 11 to 8 days.
  • The overall days between the petition and the election is now 24 days, a reduction of 14 days or 37% from the time under the old rules.
    • In stipulated elections (no hearing held) the time was even less (23 days), 15 days less than under the old rules.
    • In directed elections (hearing held) the reduction in time was the most dramatic – 34 days versus 66 days under the old rules – a 51% reduction. This statistic may be somewhat skewed, however, because of the enormous number of cases in the 90th percentile of directed elections which are over 100 days – many far over.
    • The number of days was slightly higher in RD (decertification) cases (25 days) and RM (employer petition) cases (28 days).
  • Somewhat surprisingly, union win rates were down slightly overall to 64% (a 1% decline) and in RC cases to 68% (a 2% decline).
  • The election agreement rate is steady, up only slightly from 91 to 92%.

As we have previously emphasized, as a result of these new rules, employers should have a response and campaign procedure in place long before a representation petition approaches management’s door.

  • Partner

    Bob’s practice focuses on representing and advising employers in complex labor relations and employment planning and disputes, including trade secrets/non-compete controversies and wage and hour. Bob has obtained numerous ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 5 Minute Read

As indicated in our previous blog on this topic, on May 30, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a two page order invalidating five elements of the NLRB’s 2019 election regulation, based on Count One of the plaintiff’s complaint.  On June 7, the court issued its promised memorandum opinion further explaining that order.

The opinion makes three key points.

Time 3 Minute Read

In mid-May the NLRB established a clear rule regarding stray marks on ballots in union representation elections, eradicating years of convoluted and inconsistent precedent. The decision, which applied retroactively, resulted in a union’s failure to amass a majority of the votes and, consequently, a reversal of the Regional Director’s Decision and Certification of Representation.

In a dispute between Providence Portland Medical Center (the “Employer”) and Service Employees International Union Local 49 (the “Union”), the representation election was decided by the narrowest margin, ultimately resulting in 383 votes for representation, and 382 votes against representation. Included in the mix was a single ballot with a clear “X” in the “Yes” box and a dark diagonal line with a smudge mark in the “No” box. The ALJ and Regional Director applied Board precedent and both concluded that the smudge mark on the diagonal line in the “No” box was an “obvious attempt at erasure,” resulting in the ballot being counted in favor of representation.

Time 11 Minute Read

The last few weeks of a National Labor Relations Board Member’s term can be a busy time.  This is especially true when a Member’s imminent departure will leave the Board without any Members from the minority political party.  The Board historically has avoided major shifts in precedent without the participation of both parties.

Last month was no different.  As the clock wound down on Democrat Lauren McFerran’s term this December, the Board issued a flurry of significant rules and opinions that pare back many of the most anti-employer precedents set during the Obama-era.  Issuing these rulings prior to Member McFerran’s departure allowed the Board to include her dissenting views in most cases.  But ultimately, the Republican-majority prevailed–resulting in good news for employers going forward on multiple fronts.  We summarize the Board’s “December to Remember” below.

Time 3 Minute Read

Yesterday, the National Labor Relations Board published a final rule modifying its representation case procedures.

The final rule takes effect April 17, 2020, and scales back—but does not completely undo—the changes to election regulations instituted by the Obama-era’s Board that have caused employers heartburn since 2015. Those changes effectively sped up the election process and cut down on employers’ ability to litigate many important legal issues prior to voting, putting employers at a disadvantage.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page