Supreme Court Nullifies 600 NLRB Decisions; General Counsel Meisburg Leaves The Agency
Time 3 Minute Read

Two significant developments last week affect the functioning of the country's federal agency in charge of overseeing union-management relations. The first is a decision by the US Supreme Court and the second is the resignation of the agency's general counsel effective June 18th.

As a result of political disagreements over nominations to fill vacancies on the National labor Relations Board, the Board operated with only two of its five members during 2008, 2009 and into 2010.  During that time, the two members decided almost 600 cases (though most were not particularly controversial from the standpoint of illuminating policy or setting precedent).  On June 17, the Supreme Court ruled in New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 08-1457, that the two members did not have the authority to decide those cases because they did not constitute a proper quorum under the National Labor Relations Act.  Instead, the Court ruled that at least three sitting Board members were required for the NLRB to act.  The ruling nullifies the decisions made in all 600 cases and effectively remands the cases back to the Board for re-adjudication.

Currently, the NLRB has four sitting members.  This number will reduce to three when Republican Member Schaumber's term runs out in August, 2010.   All three remaining Board members are Democratic appointees. Typically, a fully constituted Board decides 300 to 400 cases per year and there was already a backlog of several hundred cases to be decided prior to the re-arrival of the 600 cases affected by the Supreme Court's decision.  Thus, the log jam of cases at the Board may continue as the Members wrestle with re-deciding the remanded cases.  It is unlikely that the current Board will overturn those decisions which favored unions or employees and there may be occasion for the new Board to change the law or Board's policy in the reconsideration of some of the cases.

We previously predicted that the new Board will overturn a significant number of decisions rendered in favor of employers during the preceding administration.  The agenda to consider those cases will be directed by the NLRB's General Counsel who has the authority to prioritize the cases coming before the Board.  With the departure of General Counsel Ron Meisburg, the President now has the opportunity to appoint his replacement.  However, even with the appointment of a new general counsel, the remand of these 600 cases may affect the Board's timetable in working through the predicted pro-labor agenda.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On November 6, 2025, the Eighth Circuit issued its decision in Home Depot U.S.A. v. NLRB, reaffirming the right of employers to prohibit employees (particularly those in customer-facing roles) from wearing politically-charged insignia on their work uniforms. 

Time 5 Minute Read

On July 30, 2025, Acting General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) William B. Cowen (“Cowen”) issued a General Counsel memorandum providing guidance to the NLRB’s Regional Directors on addressing jurisdictional issues between the NLRB and the National Mediation Board (“NMB”).

Time 2 Minute Read

On July 7, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Apple Inc. v. NLRB (Case No. 24-60242) handed Apple a victory, declining to enforce the NLRB’s ruling that Apple had violated the National Labor Relations Act by unlawfully confiscating union literature left in an employee breakroom. 

Time 6 Minute Read

On May 5, 2025, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) for the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) ruled that retailer Costco Wholesale Corp. (“Costco”) violated the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or the “Act”) when it asked employees involved in an internal investigation regarding sexual harassment allegations to sign a confidentiality agreement prohibiting them from discussing details concerning the investigation. The ALJ’s decision highlights considerations employers ought to take into account when balancing their interests in maintaining the integrity of internal investigations and complying with the NLRA.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page