ESG Considerations in M&A
Time 3 Minute Read

In a recent post (“Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance: What are the Risks, Really?”), we discussed the various risks, trending issues, and emerging concerns arising from environmental, social, and corporate governance factors (“ESG”). As noted previously, neglecting ESG considerations can result in a number of risks to a company, including risks associated with the reputational, financial, and legal impacts of handling ESG issues poorly. We also observed how managing ESG issues well can enhance corporate value and performance, and create competitive advantages for companies. Given these emerging risks and opportunities, it is perhaps unsurprising that ESG has begun to play a larger role in the M&A context in recent years.

One area where we have seen the influence of ESG in M&A transactions is in the due diligence process. ESG due diligence can help buyers identify key ESG-related risks, which may affect the buyer’s reputation, the valuation of the target, as well as the structure of the deal. While some ESG diligence may relate to topics traditionally covered in the ordinary due diligence process, ESG due diligence typically goes further and focuses on the values, culture and social responsibility of the target. For instance, traditional due diligence typically addresses the target’s compliance with labor and employment laws; however, ESG due diligence may address issues related to workplace diversity, gender inequity, sexual harassment and workplace misconduct.

The specific ESG issues that a buyer will be most concerned about will depend on a number of factors, including the buyer’s expectations, the target’s industry and where the target operates. It may also depend on whether a buyer is seeking financing for the transaction and whether that lender has adopted a specific set of ESG standards. Increasingly, buyers’ investors, including limited partners in private equity funds, are also pushing for more ESG considerations in the acquisition process. Some ESG issues that may be relevant in a transaction involving a retailer include climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, human rights and labor standards, supply chain transparency and workplace and supply chain diversity.

Another area where we have seen the influence of ESG in M&A transactions is in the negotiation of transaction agreements and the protections that are being built into these agreements. Transaction agreements may address certain ESG issues through representations and warranties, such as environmental matters, privacy and data security, labor relations and corruption and anti-bribery. With the growing focus on ESG by various stakeholders, however, buyers may consider negotiating additional ESG-related representations and warranties. For instance, so-called “Weinstein” clauses or “MeToo” representations requiring targets to disclose misconduct allegations are increasingly being added to transaction agreements. Such clauses may form the basis of an indemnification claim after closing or potentially allow the buyer to refuse to close the transaction.

Post-closing, ESG should continue to remain a focus during the integration process. Buyers should develop a plan for aligning the target’s ESG policies with those of the buyer. Buyers should also develop a plan addressing any material ESG-related risks that were identified during ESG due diligence.

We expect ESG considerations in M&A transactions to continue to develop. New ESG-related risks and opportunities will emerge and corporate strategies will need to adapt to identify opportunities and mitigate risks.

Tags: ESG
  • Counsel

    Hannah focuses her practice on ESG and sustainability, securities law, and corporate governance for both domestic and international clients. Her experience spans advising on ESG reporting and governance, US securities laws ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 7 Minute Read

For companies assessing their compliance obligations under California’s climate disclosure laws, the whirlwind of legal developments, shifting implementation guidance from the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and uncertainty about the laws’ applicability and substantive compliance obligations continues to present challenges.

Time 1 Minute Read

Still feeling the love from Valentine’s Day, this 2024 Year in Review highlights the most swoon-worthy coverage decisions of 2024 and offers a glimpse of the future of insurance coverage litigation in 2025 and beyond.

In 2024, D&O coverage and core insurance law principles were the true heartthrobs of the year, while rulings on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues showed that insurance disputes can arise in any situation. But the real cupid’s arrow? Policy interpretation—still the key to unlocking these cases. As we reflect on the year, this edition of our Year in Review highlights the most love-worthy coverage decisions of 2024 and examines the evolving landscape of insurance coverage litigation heading into 2025.

Time 2 Minute Read

On February 4, 2024, California legislators introduced a bill, the Fashion Environmental Accountability Act (AB 405), which would require fashion brands to disclose their environmental impact, carbon emissions, water use, and waste. The proposed regulation would apply to brands with total annual revenue over $1 billion and that do business in California.

Time 1 Minute Read

In a recent client alert, Hunton insurance lawyers Lorelie S. Masters, Geoffrey B. Fehling, and Charlotte E. Leszinske discuss emerging ESG-related risks and insurers’ interests in those risks when underwriting insurance policies.  Increased focus on ESG by regulators and the public have brought ESG programs and ESG-related liabilities, such as “greenwashing,” to the forefront.  Insurers are also paying attention to these risks and have signaled that their clients’ efforts to address ESG may factor into underwriting of their insurance policies.  Many emerging ESG risks may be covered under existing corporate insurance programs, including directors and officers insurance.  Before incurring a claim, companies should proactively evaluate their insurance program and assess ESG-related risks, expecting that they may need to explain such assessments to their insurers.  Read the full alert here.  

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page